Quality surrounds each and every individual in
this world; yet, many of them do not know what quality is. Actually, many of
them may think that they understand quality, however, truth is, nobody knows
for sure since quality may take many different shapes and forms. This aspect is
pursued in detail throughout Pirsig’s novel Zen
and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, as the protagonist battles
constantly with the pressure of figuring out the definition of quality himself.
Before
attempting to begin the journey to define quality, one must understand that it
will be one of the hardest terms to define in one’s life. Pirsig demonstrates
this difficulty by clearly portraying in his novel’s protagonist the difficulty
and frustration he encounters while attempting to define it. The protagonist
and narrator is nameless throughout the novel, and he pursues his past self by
going on a motorcycle road trip across the U.S. as he does so, he finds himself
in various situations where he fids himself having memories of the past and the
frustration he felt when trying to define quality. Having been a philosophy
professor, he had once suffered such great difficulties in defining quality
that he was unable to provide his students with a definition, instead, he assigned
an essay where they could brainstorm their own and provide help to the entire
class the next day. The assignment shows how the professor was ashamed, and
maybe even embarrassed in not being able to provide the students with a
definition to such a common word, “quality”.
The
narrator’s past self was called Phaedrus. At the end of the novel the reader is
given the understanding that the narrator changed his life completely to leave
the soul of Phaedrus and become something else. Some factor in Phaedrus’ life
was not allowing it to be enjoyable, which caused the separation between
Phaedrus and the narrator. That factor was the presence of the mysterious
“quality” in his life. On the narrator’s road trip, however, he finds himself
pursuing that definition again, attempting to explain it to others, and
debating on whether or not they understand it or if even he understands it for
himself. Once when the protagonist and his son, Chris, were staying in Montana
at a friend’s house, he was asked to talk about “quality” and he show he was
studying it. Pirsig provided a myriad of the protagonist’s inner thoughts at
this point, displaying the narrator’s difficulty and uncertainty of whether or
not to try to explain as he was not sure of the definition himself and the
others wouldn’t be able to understand it either. The difficulty of quality
always shined through the protagonist’s actions, and the pressure of its
understanding affected everyone surrounding him.
Quality
in real life is given the impression that it is common and widely known. Yet
has everybody stopped to think what quality fully entails? Is quality applied
in the same manner to all aspects of the real world? What does it mean to have
a quality life? A quality meal? A quality workout?
No comments:
Post a Comment