People never really change-
At the
end of the book Pirsig reveals that he has been speaking about himself in third
person, referring to Phaedrus throughout the whole novel. “Phaedrus”, Pirsig’s
former personality was of a philosopher with a creative mind. He thought about
anything and everything nonstop, until one day his mind became too much for
him. In other words, his thoughts led him to a sort of realization about his
life which caused him to go insane and enter a deep depression. After undergoing electroshock therapy, he left
his family and was considered cured because it was thought that he was a
completely different person. However, as time went on, he started going back to
his old ways, as we can throughout the book. The dreams he keeps having are
about Phaedrus who is revealing himself to Pirsig little by little, indicating
that he is coming back and eventually does. His constant rambling and ongoing
thoughts about a single word seem to not only overtake his head, but make his
readers as well as himself insane. The thoughts and ideas he has resemble those
Phaedrus had before he went insane, in fact they were about the same topic. Not
to mention, Pirsig almost loses his family again as his relationship with Chris
diminishes.
Life can’t be figured out
through rational thinking-
In other words, Pirsig is showing us that the truth about life will
never be found through rational thinking. Pirsig continually searched for a
rational and logical explanation to every situation and scenario, but
eventually realized that science and philosophy are merely gateways of the truth, but we use love or
religion in order to try and understand life. You can’t explain everything in
life through science and philosophy. For example, in class we spoke about space
and its endless boundaries and how it just blows our mind; it does not make
sense. We also spoke about how humans make rather stupid decisions that are
damaging to one’s own health and considered irrational for the basic reason
that we can; the actual truth behind it is unexplainable. Darwinism or
creationism, there is no absolute truth. Yet, we use religion and give God the responsibility
of being the answer to all the unknown questions.
Search
for identity-
Although this book has been
repeatedly described as a guide for living, the book does not actually tell you
what do or how to do something. Instead, Pirsig gives the readers a variety of
ideas and even though Pirsig has his own preference, the book forces you as a
reader to think about the ideas and come up with a conclusion on your own, your
own personal idea. In essence, the book is encouraging one to pursue things for
the sake of their own interest and avoiding fear as a motivation for your quest,
rather than following the crowd. The book becomes a gateway to exploring new
ideas and finding out how you feel about them, therefore, learning new things
about yourself. Through my personal experience, I think I can say that I learned
about myself because as Pirsig developed ideas, I thought about them and either
agreed, disagreed or had my own opinion towards them which as a result causes
you to think about other things in life through the eyes of those ideas.
Finding a bridge between classical and romantic thinking-
Throughout
the entire book, Pirsig clearly differentiated the differences between
classical and romantic thinking as well as doing. John and Sylvia were perfect
examples of romantic people while Pirsig was the face of classical reasoning. Although
he had some obvious preference towards a classical way of being, he never
belittled romantics and considered it as a wrong way of thinking. Yet, as the
book goes on, one begins to realize Pirsig’s ulterior motive stating that a
person can only handle the truths, frustrations, and problems of everyday life
by accepting both the romantic and classical views. This means understanding
irrational ideas as well as science and reason.
Pirsig suggests that a combination of both will bring a higher quality
of life. Phaedrus’ purpose in the book is to be the bridge between classical
and romantic views because he has found a common ground and comprehends both
sides. If this split continues, according to Pirsig, then people will continue
to go on a path to ultimate failure.
No comments:
Post a Comment