I think that your strongest theme is the definition of quality. Since Pirsig does mention quality and its definition according to him many, many times in the book you will have no trouble at all getting inspiration and ideas for this theme. It may also be interesting if you were to throw in some of your ideas as to what quality is and contradict or support Pirsig's ideas. If you made your paper like a debate almost between your ideas and his.
Your weakest theme in my opinion is the one where you say that nothing is absolute. I an not quite sure what you are trying to discuss here, but from what I can gather you are contending that nothing is certain. This kind of ties in with your theme about no right and wrong answer. The fact that the is no fact. In some way it ties in to our discussions of NFTU. I think this is an interesting topic but it is not one that is discussed directly at length in the book and for that reason it will be a weaker paper than your other ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment