My thesis statement will be something along the lines of:
Through the simplistic nature of repairing a motorcycle Pirsig is able to express the same complexities as Camus does in the Stranger and Dostoyevsky in Notes from The Underground, nevertheless he does so with his own twist.
**I know that thesis sucks but it's a start?**
Outline:
- My view/ take on Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
- Phaedrus being fairly misunderstood and being limited through his knowledge
- Why situations like that of Phaedrus' are a problem, why they are necessary
- Why a motorcycle seems like a good tool to use in a discussion about values
- Underground man in relation to Phaedrus (ideaology)
- Relation of both characters in terms of limitation
- Phaedrus not at "complete" clarity since he still is able to become something
- Motorcycle Maintenance in relation to The Stranger
- Simplicity of both characters because of an understanding of basic human nature
- comparison (but more of a contrast) of the ideologies in Stranger and NFTU
-Differences with all three
- what differences/ discrepancies exist
- which ones I believe in
No comments:
Post a Comment